skip to Main Content
Azole fungicides are used primarily on wheat, corn, and soybeans.

Archived Blog Posts
  • Eaters Deserve More Complete Information About Nutrition and Health Impacts on Food Labels  

    Multiple lines of evidence point to consumer food choices as major contributors to diet-related disease, and poor health and fitness. In a peer-reviewed journal article published today, authors Chuck Benbrook and Robin Mesnage cite studies indicating that “Some 90% of the estimated USD 4.3 trillion in annual health care costs in the US is triggered or made worse by poor food quality and diet-related disease.” Benbrook is the founder and former executive director of the Heartland Health Research Alliance (HHRA). The authors recommend novel metrics on both the nutrient density of food, and how to more accurately and usefully characterize the degree of food processing and its impacts on public health. The article is open access in the journal Foods and entitled “Enhanced Labeling to Promote Consumption of Nutrient Dense Foods and Healthier Diets.” The core nutrient density metric is a ratio: the percent of daily nutrient needs satisfied by a serving of food relative to the percent of a 2000 calorie daily diet taken up by the serving of food. This single metric is unmatched in comprehensively reflecting the nutritional quality of food. A graphic option to convey the metric on packaging is presented in Figure 3 in the new paper: A novel graphic is presented in Figure 5 to which integrates both the nutrient density and food processing metrics and graphics in a single graphic, shown below. The impacts of ultra-processed food (UPF) on public health outcomes is among the hottest topics in nutrition, medical, and public health journals, and media coverage on food quality and health outcomes. At the request of the journal, the authors developed a video abstract that explains the paper’s goals, methods, and key findings and recommendations. The authors conclude their paper with these observations: Transparent and accurate food product-specific ingredient and nutrient composition data should determine the content of nutrition health labeling. Efforts to soften the message should be resisted in light of the overwhelming need for new food labels that help bring about substantial improvements in food nutritional quality and dietary choices. Benbrook and Mesnage’s paper builds on public comments HHRA submitted in response to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed rule in 2023 to update the definition of the term “healthy” on food labels. The proposed role would require foods labeled “healthy” to contain minimum amounts of foods recommended by USDA’s Dietary Guidelines, and to limit saturated fat, sodium, added sugar and other less healthy nutrients. Entitled “Food Labeling: Nutrient Content Claims; Definition of Term `Healthy’”, the comments recommended new  nutrition/health messaging on the front of food packaging. Co-authors of comments included the chair of HHRA’s Policy Advisory committee Dr. Kathleen Merrigan, HHRA science advisors, and other experts working on how changes in farming systems and technology can increase the nutritional quality of food: Dr. Hannah Flower, Dr. Donald R. Davis, Dr. David Montgomery and Anne Biklé. In the comments, the authors introduced “NuCal” as a name for their new system. Resources HHRA February 2023 comments to the FDA. Benbrook and Mesnage (2024). Enhanced Labeling to Promote Consumption of Nutrient Dense Foods and Healthier Diets, Foods. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13213377 Video Abstract: “Enhanced Labeling to Promote Consumption of Nutrient Dense Foods and Healthier Diets”

  • HHRA Weighs in on Key Pesticide Issues Under Review by the National Organic Standards Board

    HHRA and ORG-Tracker, represented by Dr. Chuck Benbrook and Dr. Brian Baker, submitted comments to the Agricultural Marketing Service at the USDA in advance of the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) meeting in Portland, Oregon, from October 22nd to 24th, 2024. Drs. Benbrook and Baker will both attend the conference and deliver public comments. ORG-Tracker is a project carried out by HHRA. It aggregates pesticide residue data from inspections of organic farms carried out by certifiers. The tables generated by ORG-Tracker utilize the results of certifier testing to compare residue frequency and risk levels to food produced on conventional farms. The team is working to more effectively highlight gaps and challenges faced by certification agencies to answer questions like What crops should we be testing, and where? Is a pesticide residue found in an organic sample likely caused by accident, pesticide drift, or an intentional and illegal application? How can we modify organic programs to better mitigate risk? The comments delivered to the USDA discuss risk-based certification, pesticide residue testing, and policies impacting the incorporation of so-called inert ingredients in the biopesticides approved for use on organic farms. They argue for a more rigorous, comprehensive, and health-focused approach to risk oversight. Regarding residue testing, they advocate for more expansive and effective data aggregation to inform consumers and the organics community. Finally, for inert ingredients, they recommend further review of current policy, including increased transparency of ingredients in pesticide products. Thank you to Drs. Benbrook and Baker for your advocacy and hard work!   The three sets of comments are posted on HHRA’s website as part of our policy program: Comments to the NOSB on the Risk-Based Certification Discussion Document Under Consideration During the October 2024 Meeting in Portland, Oregon Written Comments on the NOSB Discussion Document “Residue Testing for the Global Supply Chain” Comments on the Inert Ingredients in Organic Pesticide Products Proposal dated August 13, 2024   Drs. Benbrook and Baker also submitted and presented comments at the Spring 2024 meeting of the NOSB, which are available on HHRA’s Policy and Regulatory Reform page.

  • Dr. Kimberly Yolton joins HHRA board

    Dr. Yolton is a developmental psychologist and epidemiologist serving as Professor of Pediatrics at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Her interests include exposures and experiences that may alter a child’s developmental trajectory from infancy through adolescence. She collaborates on research projects on typical child development as well as those focused on the impact of exposures to environmental toxicants, opiates and stress during early development.

  • Paul Hartnett, HHRA’s Executive Director

      Paul Hartnett has served as HHRA’s CFO since our founding . With the departure of Russell King, Paul has now joined the board and Executive Director. We thank Russell for his service and wish him the best in his future endeavors.

  • Heartland Study Enrolls 1,000th Mother-Infant Pair

    July 19, 2024 – In June of this year, the Heartland Study achieved a major milestone, enrolling its 1,000th mother-infant pair. Enrollment is now at 50% of goal. The objective of the Study is to help fill major gaps in our understanding of the impacts of herbicides on maternal and infant health. Currently in Phase 1, the Study is focused on evaluating associations between herbicide concentrations in body fluids and tissue samples from pregnant women and infants, and pregnancy/childbirth outcomes. Phase 2 is designed to evaluate potential associations between herbicide biomarkers and early childhood neurological development. Much appreciation for the mothers enrolled, and the entire Heartland Study Team including scientists, support staff and clinicians for this tremendous achievement, and for our funders to making this work possible. Read more about the study including peer-reviewed studies published in Chemosphere and Agrichemicals at our publications  page. The investment required to conduct this study exceeds $1 million each year. You can support this important work by making a donation here.

Fungicides Use, a Resistant Pathogen, and Rising Death Rates — CDC Connects the Dots

May 5th, 2021
May 5th, 2021
Azole fungicides are used primarily on wheat, corn, and soybeans.

In the 1950s and 1960s, rapidly rising use of antibiotics to promote growth of farm animals triggered mutations leading to resistant bacteria that have found ways to jump into the human population.

For most of the last one-half century, over 7 pounds of antibiotics have been given to farm animals for every 1 pound administered to people. Pigs, chickens, and beef cattle have been an important, and perhaps the primary well from which new antibiotic resistant genes have emerged.

In the 1970s and 1980s, insecticides and herbicides took over primary insect and weed control duty on most American farmers. The better a particular pesticide worked, the more farmers came to rely on it. But just as in the case with antibiotics on the farm, excessive reliance triggered the emergence and spread of resistant strains of many economically damaging pests.

And so, no one should be surprised that the rapidly rising use of triazole fungicides by farmers over the last decade is now contributing to the emergence and spread of fungal pathogens that cause human disease. But not just any run-of-the-mill fungal pathogen.

A new paper by a team of scientists from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and US Geological Survey (USGS), “Trends in Agricultural Triazole Fungicide Use in the United States, 1992–2016 and Possible Implications for Antifungal-Resistant Fungi in Human Disease,” tracks the rising frequency in phenotypes of the fungus A. fumigatus that are resistant to triazole drugs (Toda et al., 2021).

A. fumigatus can lodge in and attack the lungs. It is the leading cause of invasive mold infections, especially in people with weakened immune systems. Death rates range between 25% and 59%, but average 25% higher when a patient is infected with triazole-resistant A. fumigatus.

The CDC team points out that some A. fumigatus strains carry resistance markers that have been associated with environmental fungicide use, rather than previous patient exposure to antifungal, triazole drugs.

Key Findings

This fungicide research was led by a team from CDC with support from USGS.

CDC analyzed fungicide use data from the USGS and found that from 2006–2016, triazole use in agriculture more than quadrupled (up 434%) to 2,880 metric tons in just a decade. Since 2016, triazole use has risen another 15%. Worldwide, triazoles account for about one-quarter of total fungicide use in agriculture.

Wheat, corn, soybeans, and other crops in the Midwest and Southeast accounted for most of the increase. Until about a decade ago, almost no corn acres were sprayed with any fungicide. In 2021 over 30% of the national crop will likely be treated. A triazole fungicide will be the product of choice for about one-third of these treatments.

HHRA has prepared two tables with national data on the use of 13 triazole fungicides from 1991 through 2019. The data were retrieved from HHRA’s Pesticide Use Data System (PUDS).

Access here a table tracking changes in pounds applied of the 5 mostly heavily used triazoles, other triazoles, and all triazoles. Figure 1 below tracks the remarkable rise in use since the early 2000s.

Access here a similar table showing the upward trend in acre-treatments with triazole fungicides. Figure 2 presents these data graphically. Access the Excel workbook with these tables and figures here.

Note in both figures that over the last decade propiconazole plus tebuconazole have accounted for 58% to 75% of the total pounds and acre-treatments made with all triazole fungicides. These two fungicides are among those most structurally similar to the triazole medications widely used to treat A. fumigatus infections.

The CDC team stresses the need to conduct more intensive monitoring of A. fumigatus populations to track the spread of triazole resistant phenotypes. They call for more focused research on what is driving the steep increase in triazole fungicide use on some crops. Since the early 1990s, the pounds of triazole fungicides applied has risen 15-fold. Over 50 million acre-treatments were made with a triazole in 2019, or close to 15% of all harvested cropland in the US.

What is Driving the Rapid Rise in Triazole Fungicide Use?

In short, unhealthy soil and sick plants.

Over the last 50 years farmers have intensified crop production in multiple ways.

The number of corn, soybean, wheat, and cotton seeds planted per acre has at least tripled, and on some farms seeding rates have gone up four-fold. This means plant root systems now overlap and share the same soil. A soil-borne pathogen infecting one plant can infect another without moving.

With today’s high seeding rates, about 35,000 corn plants per acre are separated by only inches, instead of about a foot as in the past. When the wind blows, plants rub against each other, causing abrasions through which fungal spores and bacteria can enter plants. Once in the door, disease can often flourish.

To obtain optimal yields of corn, farmers must apply 150-250 pounds of nitrogen (N) fertilizer. As seeding rates rise, the amount of N needed per bushel rises and N-use efficiency falls.

The spike in soil N levels following fertilizer applications triggers explosions in the populations of certain microorganisms and crashes in the population of others. This cycle degrades soil health over time. The absence of healthy, diverse soil microbial communities opens the door to opportunistic pathogens and soil-borne insects.

Slipping soil health increases pest pressure. Incrementally greater pest pressure triggers more pesticide use. More chemicals cause further damage to soil ecosystems, leading to new pests and more problems. It’s a vicious circle that a growing number of farmers are now struggling to severe.

Most of the corn, soybeans, and cotton grown in the US is planted with seeds genetically engineered (GE) to express multiple transgenes conferring resistance to herbicides. In the case of corn and cotton, GE plants also produce Bt endotoxins to combat sucking, chewing insects. Most corn and cotton varieties express two or three Bt endotoxins, and SmartStax corn produces six and is resistant to three herbicides.

These GE plants have multiple genetic elements added to them designed to turn on these added traits at the right time, in the right place, and hopefully turn them off when not needed. The combined effect of these novel genes in GE cultivars can disrupt, delay, overamp, or block a plant’s normal response to biotic and abiotic stress, sometimes leading to new plant health problems.

This new CDC paper confirms that farmers, the pesticide industry, scientists, and physicians have a new problem to worry about. Like many others, this new problem is grounded in plant and soil health and caused by the practices, technologies, and systems farmers have relied on to drive crop yields upward.

Source:

Toda, Mitsuru, Beer, Karlyn D., Kuivila, Kathryn M., Chiller, Tom M., & Jackson, Brendan R.; “Trends in Agricultural Triazole Fungicide Use in the United States, 1992–2016 and Possible Implications for Antifungal-Resistant Fungi in Human Disease;” Environmental Health Perspectives, 2021, 129(5); DOI: 10.1289/ehp7484.

Back To Top