skip to Main Content

Project Bibliography

Bibliographies Grouped by Tag:
24 D | Adjuvants | Agricultural Health Study | Agrochemicals | AMPA | Analytical Methods | Atrazine | Autism | Biodiversity | Biomarkers | Biomonitoring | Birth Cohort Studies | Birth Defects | Birthweight | Cancer | Children | Chlorpyrifos | Climate Change | Communicating Science | Crop Science | Cumulative Toxicity | Cypermethrin | Cytotoxicity | DDT | Desiccation | Developmental Impacts | Diazinon | Dicamba | Dicamba Part I | Dicamba Part II | Dicamba Part III | Dicamba Watch | Diet | Dietary Risk | Diversified Weed Management/Integrated Pest Management (IPM) | DNA Damage | Economics | Endocrine Disruptors | Endosulfan | Environmental Health | Environmental Impacts | Environmental Racism | EPA Regulation | Epidemiological Studies | Epigenetic Impacts | Ethics and Environmental Justice | ethnicity | Exposure | Exposure at School and Public Spaces | Exposure in Pets | Female Reproductive Impacts | Fertility | Food Systems | Full Text Available | Fungicides | Gastrointestinal Impacts | GBH | Gender | Genetically Modified Crops | Genotoxicity | Gestational Length | Glufosinate | Glyphosate | Heartland Region | Herbicide Exposure | Herbicide Industry Labels and User Guides | Herbicide Use | Herbicides | HHRA Publication | Imidacloprid | Insecticides | Invertebrate Toxicity | Kidney Disease | Liver Damage | Lowdown on Roundup Part I | Lowdown on Roundup Part II | Lowdown on Roundup Part III | Lowdown on Roundup Part IV | Male Reproductive Impacts | Maternal Gut Microbiome | Meta-Analysis or Review Paper | Metolachlor | Microbiome | Miscarriage Rate | Multi-omics | National Cancer Institute | Neonicotinoids | Neurodevelopmental Toxicity | Nitric Oxide | Obesity | Occupational Exposure | Organic | Organic vs Conventional | Organochlorines | Organophosphates | Other Health Risks | Oxamyl | Oxidative Stress | Paraquat | Parkinson's Disease | Persistent Organic Pollutants | Pesticide Drift | Pesticide Effectiveness | Pesticide Exposure | Pesticide Legislation | Pesticide Registration | Pesticide Residues | Pesticide Resistance | Pesticide Toxicity | Pesticide Use | Policy and Politics | Pollinators | Pregestational Obesity | Pregnancy | prenatal | Public Health | Pyrethroids | Regenerative Agriculture | Remediation | Reproductive Impacts | Resistant Weeds | Risk Assessment | Roundup | Rural Health | Science Team Publication | Seasonal | Soil Health | Sperm Quality | Surfactants | Toxicity | Traizoles | Trends Analysis | Weed Management Systems
Combine bibliography tags from the above list:

Pucci, 2017

Jackie Pucci, “Missouri Latest State to Set Cut-off Dicamba Date for ’18,” CropLife, November 20, 2017.

SUMMARY:

Reports on the Dicamba ban on Engenia use in Missouri for 2018 after June 10 (some counties) or July 15 (all counties).  Adds the detail that all applicators will be required to receive mandatory training by state Extension offices.  FULL TEXT


FERN’s Ag Insider, 2017

FERN’s Ag Insider, “Missouri limits use of BASF’s dicamba weedkiller,” November 16,2017.

SUMMARY:

The Missouri Agriculture Department announces a partial ban on the use of BASF’s Engenia on cotton and soybeans. Engenia applicatiosn will be banned after June 10, 2018 in 10 southeastern counties most affected this year, and after July 15 across the rest of the state. Further restrictions on Monsanto and DuPont’s new dicamba formulations are forthcoming, the Department said.  FULL TEXT


Davies, 2017

Steve Davies, “No dicamba use after April 15, Arkansas plant board says,” Agri-Pulse, November 8, 2017.

SUMMARY:

On Wednesday November 7, the Arkansas State Plant Board voted 10-3 to ban dicamba use between April 16-October 31 in 2018. Monsanto was “fiercely opposed” to this ban, which now heads to the executive committee of the Arkansas Legislative Council for final approval. Monsanto has filed a lawsuit against the plant board over the partial ban implemented this year, and submitted extensive comments against the 2018 ban. BASF’s Engenia herbicide was the only dicamba formulation approved in Arkansas in 2017 for use with the new resistant crops, and Monsanto claims that BASF told them that it sold only about enough Engenia to cover half the state’s soybean crop. This would mean that much of the dicamba sprayed in 2017 was off-label use, a claim disputed by other experts.  FULL TEXT


Bradley, 2017c

Kevin Bradley, “A Final Report on Dicamba-injured Soybean Acres,” University of Missouri, Integrated Pest and Crop Management, October 30, 2017.

Final compilation of state by state dicamba damage complaints reveals:

  • 2,708 dicamba related complaints across 25 states
  • Approximately 3.6 million acres of soybeans injured

See the FULL TEXT link for maps.

 


Lipton, 2017

Eric Lipton, “Crops in 25 States Damaged by Unintended Drift of Weed Killer,” The New York Times, November 1, 2017.

SUMMARY:

“Dicamba has damaged more than 3.6 million acres of soybean crops, or about 4 percent of all soybeans planted in the United States this year.”  Reuben Baris, acting chief of the herbicide branch at the EPA, calls the damage “unacceptable” and suggests that the actual number of drift incidents could be up to 5 times greater than he over 2,700 reports due to a large number of incidents going unreported.  Impacts to yields are still unknown, according to the EPA.   The initial approval of dicamba for over the top use expires after only 2 years.  This article states that EPA officials made it clear that re-approval is in jeopardy if the companies can’t find ways to mitigate damage.  FULL TEXT


Polansek, 2017c

Tom Polansek, “Monsanto, BASF weed killers strain U.S. states with damage complaints,” Reuters, November 1, 2017.

SUMMARY:

Reports on the latest on the 2017 dicamba damage crisis.  Major soybean states such as Arkansas, Missouri, and Illinois received roughly 4 years’ worth of complaints about damaged crops.  A total of 2,708 damage investigations have been initiated as of October 15th. In Illinois, where they received 421 complaints, the most since 1989, they expect investigations to continue through next year. Investigations will determine if applicators followed lengthy label instructions (up to 4,550 words).  Monsanto believes this off-label application is the issue and plans to change usage instructions before the next crop season. The article points out the expense to state ag agencies to cover this surge in complaints and associated staff demands.  Some states are putting off other inspections to manage dicamba complaints, and budgets are strained.    The EPA has offered 35 states extra grants to help fund dicamba damage investigations, and is helping states by conducting states for low-levels of dicamba.  FULL TEXT


Mills et al., 2017

Paul J. Mills, PhD, Izabela Kania-Korwel, PhD, John Fagan, PhD, Linda K.McEvoy, PhD, Gail A. Laughlin, PhD, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD, “Excretion of the Herbicide Glyphosate in Older Adults Between 1993 and 2016,” October 24, 2017, Journal of the American Medical Association, 318:16, DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.11726.

ABSTRACT:

The herbicide Roundup is sprayed onto genetically modified crops and applied as a desiccant to most small non–genetically modified grains. Use of this herbicide has increased since 1994 when genetically modified crops were introduced in the United States. Glyphosate, the primary ingredient in the herbicide, is found in these crops at harvest. Environmental exposure through dietary intake of these crops has potential adverse health effects and can be assessed by measuring urinary excretion.  We measured excretion levels of glyphosate and its metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in participants fromthe Rancho Bernardo Study (RBS) of Healthy Aging. Mean glyphosate and AMPA levels and the proportion of samples with detectable levels increased over time. FULL TEXT


Biesecker, 2017

Michael Biesecker, “EPA, herbicide makers agree to new limits for use of dicamba,” Associated Press, October 13, 2017.

SUMMARY:

The EPA announced its deal with Monsanto, BASF and DuPont to allow dicamba use in 2018 with “tangible changes” that will be implemented in the upcoming growing season.  Dicamba will be labeled “restricted use” and applicators will be required to get additional training and certifications, and new rules will be implemented related to time of day of application and no spraying when wings are over 10 mph. The EPA worked closely with the three companies and Monsanto praised the new label restrictions, saying they are “confident the required training and record keeping can address the main causes of off-target movement.”  The EPA praises the “cooperative federalism” that brought about this agreement.  FULL TEXT


Nelsen, 2017

Arthur Nelsen, “Monsanto banned from European parliament,” The Guardian, September 28, 2017.

SUMMARY:

Lobbyists affiliated with the company were banned in September 2017 after Monsanto failed to attend a hearing about alleged regulatory interference. The company is under investigation for influencing regulatory studies conducted for glyphosate relicensing.  FULL TEXT


Charles, 2017c

Dan Charles,  “A Wayward Weedkiller Divides Farm Communities, Harms Wildlife,” NPR, October 7, 2017.

SUMMARY:

This NPR radio story focuses on the farmer to farmer conflicts engendered by the dicamba drift crisis.  Some farmers are eager for the new technology to address herbicide-resistant glyphosate, while others are devastated by drift damage.   David Wildly, an Arkansas soybean farmer says “It’s something that is so heartbreaking to me. I see farmers taking sides, and enemies being made.”   Farmers who support dicamba-resistant technology hope everyone will soon be using them so neighbors can’t be harmed.  The story then raises the issue of damage to native vegetation that pollinators rely on.  Richard Coy, a beekeeper with 13,000 hives in some of the most affected states, has seen damage to vegetation impacting blooming.  According to Coy, honey production across the region is down about one-third on average. FULL TEXT

 


Back To Top